But I deeply appreciate the gentleman's comments. My point is when you create institutionally a reason for a deadlock, it does not matter what the motivations of the leadership or the Members are. We are human beings. We have a very difficult process. We are judging our peers, our friends, our colleagues, about matters that may be very serious, or may not seem so serious to us. None of us have the ability to overcome the institutional problems that this time certain creates. I do not know that I want to be part of a process which incentivizes the breakdown of it. The only reason I said yes to the request from my own leadership to take this position was because the challenge of seeing if this process could work on a bipartisan, nonpartisan basis. This one amendment really eviscerates our ability to do that. That is why I feel so very strongly about this particular unit.
Howard Berman: “But I deeply appreciate the gentleman's comments. My point is when you create institutionally a reason for a deadlock…”
On the recordSeptember 18, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the challenges of bipartisan cooperation in legislative processes.
Share
More from Howard Berman
Dec 19, 2012
the amount shows in each of the last 3 fiscal years cuts by the Congress from the requested amount, particularly in construction, maintenance, and Embassy security.
Nov 28, 2012
By choosing not to go forward with a ground operation he saved countless Israeli and Palestinian lives.
Nov 16, 2012
I think this is a very historic piece of bipartisan legislation. Just as Jackson-Vanik became a tool to deal with one aspect of a horrible set of policies by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, we now, using the Magnitsky legislation…
Dec 30, 2012
I don't see the one individual who asked to join me in speaking on this, so I yield back the balance of my time.





