I do not think we should put artificial restrictions on the ability of the Bell companies to go into long distance, I supported the manager's amendment because it got rid of a test that made it virtually impossible for them to ever enter that competition. Now the only question is whether the Justice Department, that had the foresight starting under Gerald Ford, finishing under Ronald Reagan, to break up the Bell monopolies, should be allowed to have a meaningful role, a role defined by a test which is so restrictive that it says, unless, unless the burden supports, the assumption is with the Bell companies. It says unless the Attorney General finds that there is a dangerous probability that such company or its affiliates would successfully use market power to substantially impede competition in the market such company seeks to enter, it is an extremely rigorous test that must be met to stop them from entering the market.
Howard Berman: “I do not think we should put artificial restrictions on the ability of the Bell companies to go into long distance, I…”
On the recordAugust 4, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the role of the Justice Department in regulating Bell companies' entry into long-distance markets.
Share
More from Howard Berman
Nov 16, 2012
May I inquire as to how much time both sides have. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from California has 6\3/4\ minutes remaining. The gentleman from Indiana has 4\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Feb 23, 2016
We were appalled at Gurry's lack of accountability and transparency and his lack of judgment at attempts at keeping these illegal transfers secret.
Dec 19, 2012
This report and this hearing are just the beginning of our efforts to provide the American people with answers as to why this tragedy occurred and how to protect our diplomats and other personnel serving overseas from unnecessary risks in…





