My question is, to just make clear, my understanding is this amendment, if adopted, will not require or put any of those three limitations on. In other words, by definition this is supplanting money. The States are now spending money to operate their prisons. ... it is obvious on the face of what we are doing today this is intended to be supplanting money. It is supplanting what the States are paying out today, which they should not be paying out, because this is a Federal responsibility.
Howard Berman: “My question is, to just make clear, my understanding is this amendment, if adopted, will not require or put any of those…”
On the recordFebruary 9, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to federal funding for state prisons.
Share
More from Howard Berman
Dec 19, 2012
The amount shows in each of the last 3 fiscal years cuts by the Congress from the requested amount, particularly in construction, maintenance, and Embassy security.
Feb 23, 2016
We were appalled at Gurry's lack of accountability and transparency and his lack of judgment at attempts at keeping these illegal transfers secret.
May 15, 2013
Considering the support for that agreement all across the farming community, I am not sure why we would craft something completely new that is opposed by important members of that community.
Dec 19, 2012
Barack Obama was no more responsible for what happened in Benghazi than George W. Bush was for 9/11.





