Section 4 of this bill requires that agents directed by the copyright office to distribute webcasting royalties must make direct payment of those royalties to featured and nonfeatured recording artists and musicians. Section 4 also allows such agents to deduct their administrative and other reasonable expenses from the royalties they distribute. These provisions are somewhat unusual, so I want to confirm my understanding of their import with the distinguished chairman. It is my understanding that both provisions simply codify what is the current practice in the marketplace. Copyright office regulations require direct payment of royalties for the years 1998 to 2002, and the only distributing agent currently designated by the copyright office has contracted to make direct payments. Further, royalty recipients have agreed to allow that distributing agent to deduct its expenses from royalties. Is it the chairman's understanding that these provisions simply codify those current practices?
Howard Berman: “Section 4 of this bill requires that agents directed by the copyright office to distribute webcasting royalties must…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing provisions of a bill related to webcasting royalties and their implications.
Share
More from Howard Berman
I yield the gentleman an additional 2 minutes. Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, I would like to enter into a colloquy with the majority and minority floor managers--the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Burton) and the gentleman from California (Mr…
It is quite clear that a rate that all parties agree on is easier said than done.
I am very pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentlelady from California (Mrs. Davis).
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Madam Speaker, that is also my understanding. The intent of Congress is to place people in the classified annex only if the President determines and justifies to the relevant committees that it is vital…





