I simply would very quickly make the case that the resolution should be voted against for several reasons. Initially, because it improperly invokes a provision of the War Powers Act that's inapplicable. This war was authorized by the U.S. Congress. Secondly, the manner in which it would force withdrawal is irresponsible and I don't think is the right way to do it. And, thirdly, that I am not prepared, from this point of view, to say that failure is in any way inevitable, and that we should not at this time make the judgment to pull the plug out from what we are doing in Afghanistan. I would urge a ``no'' vote on the resolution. I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Kucinich) has 5\1/4\ minutes remaining.
Share
More from Howard Berman
I have no further requests for time. And I'd like to just raise a couple of the issues that my friends, Mr. Paul from Texas and Mr. Kucinich from Ohio, have put forth in the context of opposition to this bill. This is not the next step to…
By choosing not to go forward with a ground operation he saved countless Israeli and Palestinian lives.
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Madam Speaker, that is also my understanding. The intent of Congress is to place people in the classified annex only if the President determines and justifies to the relevant committees that it is vital…
Considering the support for that agreement all across the farming community, I am not sure why we would craft something completely new that is opposed by important members of that community.





