To reclaim my time, this is not a discussion of post offices. This is not a discussion of suspension legislation, and both parties seem to like naming post offices and introducing other kinds of resolutions. This is a discussion about the decision to send our forces into harm's way. It's worthy of a serious debate. There is nothing wrong with that debate. I don't believe our troops are going to get demoralized by our having that debate. I believe for the country, they are going to say, We are proud to represent a country that is willing to undertake that debate.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the importance of debating military decisions rather than trivial matters.
Share
More from Howard Berman
I think it is an appropriate time to recognize the strong and steadfast leadership she has demonstrated over the past 4 years.
May I inquire as to how much time both sides have. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from California has 6\3/4\ minutes remaining. The gentleman from Indiana has 4\1/2\ minutes remaining.
It is disingenuous, I have to say, Mr. Reese, for you to talk about finding the rate that will incentivize more webcasting by radio stations without acknowledging any obligation to be subject to a performance right for over-the-air…
Considering the support for that agreement all across the farming community, I am not sure why we would craft something completely new that is opposed by important members of that community.





