I rise in support of another year's extension of normal trade relations, formerly known as ``Most Favored Nations trade,'' for China. This is a tough issue, and I have great respect for people who come down on either side of the question. But in the end, I have concluded that I should base my vote not on what I hope may be in terms of China's future, but on what I think China's leaders can do. Last year, I voted against MFN for China because of my concern that China's leaders were not living up to their international agreements in regard to preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. I was concerned that the administration had failed to make this enough of a focus in its discussions with the Chinese and had not produced the results which I thought were necessary. The administration's efforts to engage China to make new commitments and to live up to old ones have intensified over the past year. They have produced some encouraging results. The U.S. and China agreed to not target strategic nuclear weapons on each other. I know this is a small step. Retargeting nuclear missiles can be accomplished in a matter of hours, if not minutes, but it is a sign that the Chinese are willing to take active steps to reduce the risk of accidental launch, and the challenge we now face is to extend this small, positive step in the direction of a more serious effort at eliminating the threat of nuclear war.
Howard Berman: “I rise in support of another year's extension of normal trade relations, formerly known as ``Most Favored Nations…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the extension of normal trade relations with China and related nuclear disarmament efforts.
Share
More from Howard Berman
I am pleased to yield such time as she may consume to the sponsor of this resolution, the gentlelady from California (Ms. Loretta Sanchez).
Considering the support for that agreement all across the farming community, I am not sure why we would craft something completely new that is opposed by important members of that community.
We must do our best to minimize the risks faced by these brave public servants and provide adequate funding to do so, but we must also recognize that such risks can never be completely eliminated.
I don't see the one individual who asked to join me in speaking on this, so I yield back the balance of my time.





