First of all, I think my colleague from California, who authorized the original program in last year's crime bill, the gentleman from California [Mr. Beilenson], through his amendment that program stays intact. It is very important for us to watch the appropriations process, particularly for certain States that do not qualify for the Truth-In-Sentencing Act. I am told by the Governor of California, even though the Justice Department does not confirm that, but I am told without qualification by the Governor of California that California qualifies under the Truth-In-Sentencing Act and, therefore, will be eligible for this new prison money that is being reserved for this program. It is on that basis and on those assurances that I am supporting the gentleman's amendment.
Howard Berman: “First of all, I think my colleague from California, who authorized the original program in last year's crime bill, the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for an amendment related to the Truth-In-Sentencing Act and prison funding.
Share
More from Howard Berman
What is the glaring incongruity in this legislation is to call it the Internet Fairness Act when the issue should be sort of the Music Fairness Act.
At the point where I am recognized, I will be also seeking unanimous consent for the same kind of referral of time to your control.
This report and this hearing are just the beginning of our efforts to provide the American people with answers as to why this tragedy occurred and how to protect our diplomats and other personnel serving overseas from unnecessary risks in…
Considering the support for that agreement all across the farming community, I am not sure why we would craft something completely new that is opposed by important members of that community.





