Personally I do not find it a bit offensive that the Congress chooses to federalize the whole question of the standards for product liability. I think a very good case can be made for giving the manufacturers uniform rules around the country, it makes sense to federalize it. I do not even quarrel with all of the features of this bill. A statute of repose, which tells a manufacturer there is a certain period of time after which that manufacturer has procured and sold the product, that will pass, and he will no longer be liable for things that go wrong with that product unless he intentionally misrepresented aspects of that product that he was selling. The Bryant amendment dealt with that slight change in the statute of repose. He was denied a chance to offer that amendment. I think that can make sense. And I think you can talk about punitive damages in the area of product liability.
Howard Berman: “Personally I do not find it a bit offensive that the Congress chooses to federalize the whole question of the standards…”
On the recordMarch 8, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the federalization of product liability standards during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Howard Berman
Aug 1, 2012
I would also yield 5 minutes of my time to the gentleman from Ohio and ask unanimous consent that he be allowed to control those 5 minutes. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from California? There…
Dec 19, 2012
We must do our best to minimize the risks faced by these brave public servants and provide adequate funding to do so, but we must also recognize that such risks can never be completely eliminated.
Sep 11, 2012
I have no further requests for time, and I'm prepared, if you're prepared to close, to yield back the balance of my time, and I will yield back the balance of my time.





