The FERC should have the authority to address cyber threats to the electric grid. That requires legislation from Congress.
Henry Waxman
The Public Record
Henry Waxman is a former U.S. Representative from California, serving from 1975 to 2015. A member of the Democratic Party, he was known for his work on health care, environmental policy, and consumer protection. During his tenure, Waxman played a key role in the passage of the Affordable Care Act and was a prominent advocate for climate change legislation. He chaired the House Energy and Commerce Committee, where he focused on issues such as tobacco regulation and health care reform.
A voluntary approach to cybersecurity may make sense for some sectors but experience has shown that it cannot be relied upon to protect the electric grid.
The problem is that recommended voluntary cybersecurity measures have not been adopted by most utilities.
The findings are sobering. Many utilities reported that the electric grid is the target of daily cyber attacks.
Madam Chair, we need to work together in a bipartisan way to protect the electric grid.
The Executive order we are examining today is a step in the right direction but we also need new legislation.
The Nation's critical infrastructure and defense installations simply cannot function without electricity.
Cybersecurity is a vital concern for sectors that span the committee's jurisdiction, from the electric grid and natural gas pipelines to telecommunications networks and health care.
In 2010, Fred Upton, now a chair, and Ed Markey, soon to be Senator from Massachusetts, had a bipartisan grid security bill.
Protecting the grid from cyber attacks and other threats is essential to our economy.
I look forward to hearing from GAO about its analysis of what other countries are doing in this area.
While the Executive Order on cyber security protections for critical infrastructure was an important step forward, this morning's hearing demonstrated that there is much more work to be done to protect the networks that undergird the…
I have serious concerns about certain aspects of these bills. I think they are a work in progress.
It is natural that a state would want to be able to tell EPA what to focus on and what to spend money on.
I hope that members of the Subcommittee are given a full opportunity to understand these bills before they are brought to markup.
Under current law, EPA seeks concurrence from states before slating a site for cleanup on the National Priorities List.
Even though Superfund is a federal program, the law provides for significant state involvement.
The states don't always do that, though, because they want federal resources and expertise brought to bear to get sites cleaned up.
I thank you for reconvening the hearing today, and I am pleased that we have the opportunity to hear from knowledgeable experts about the Superfund program.





