On the recordAugust 4, 2020
What we need to understand here today and what we explored in my hearings via our subcommittee is that it's actually the opposite. Inaction on climate change is more costly than if we took action.
Source
congress.govHarley Rouda: “What we need to understand here today and what we explored in my hearings via our subcommittee is that it's actually the…”
Editor's note · Context
Rouda argues that failing to act on climate change is more expensive than taking action.
Share
More from Harley Rouda
Aug 23, 2020
As you know, there is a bipartisan bill sitting on Mitch McConnell's desk that would eliminate the prefunding mandate and free up tens of billions of dollars for the U.S. Postal Service.
Sep 23, 2020
The bottom line is that the industries of the future are not going to be fossil fuel based.
Feb 5, 2020
The answer is simple but frightening: Because of the corrupt influence of a handful of coal companies over the Trump administration and the EPA is why we are here.
Aug 4, 2020
What we have learned from this substantial work is that climate change can no longer be thought of as something that may or may not impact us someday.
Other voices in this conversation
