I have an amendment at the desk. The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 8, line 15, after the dollar amount insert the following: ``(increased by $6,000,000) (reduced by $6,000,000)''. The CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 961, the gentlewoman from California (Mrs. Napolitano) and a Member opposed each will control 5 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from California.
Share
More from Grace Napolitano
To me, the answer is clear. We should recognize the familiarity and workability of the historic Clean Water Act.
I believe the Supreme Court purposely chose to substitute its own philosophy over decades-old, legally grounded efforts to protect water quality.
DOT recently provided an update to the Justice40 initiative. The Department has exceeded its goal of delivering 40 percent of the benefits of Federal investments to disadvantaged communities.
We should recognize the familiarity and workability of the historic Clean Water Act and get on with the preservation of the health of our economy as well as that of our communities.
Other voices in this conversation
