Grace Napolitano: “I claim time in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from California is recognized for 5…”

To me, the answer is clear. We should recognize the familiarity and workability of the historic Clean Water Act.

I believe the Supreme Court purposefully chose to substitute its own philosophy over decades-old, legally grounded efforts to protect water quality.

Each day that passes absent clarity by the Federal government on Sackett compliance is one more day that business and the environment are at risk.

We should recognize the familiarity and workability of the historic Clean Water Act and get on with the preservation of the health of our economy as well as that of our communities.