we have long talked, over the years that I have been serving in Congress, about prescription drug plans and how we can effectively deal with the countless seniors who have not been covered over the years and who continue to call our offices and come to us for assistance. Many of our seniors have been forced to choose between buying essential medications, paying for food, and I know some of them who have subsisted, when their money does not stretch far enough, by buying canned pet food for their meals. They also have to figure out how to buy their essentials: pay their rent and pay for the heat during the winter, or cool off during the hot summer weather months that we have. Women seniors, in particular, need prescription drug coverage. Over a quarter of them have no prescription drug coverage. Our Democratic plan is voluntary. Seniors who would choose to participate would pay a $25 monthly premium, $100 annual deductible, and 20 percent of their prescription drugs, up to $25,000 a year. We have talked about prescription drug benefits long enough. It is time to give seniors what they deserve, a comprehensive, reliable, affordable plan.
Grace Napolitano: “we have long talked, over the years that I have been serving in Congress, about prescription drug plans and how we can…”
On the recordJune 20, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the need for prescription drug coverage for seniors.
Share
More from Grace Napolitano
Jul 22, 2024
I thank Mr. Rouzer for being a perfect partner, and I wish him well in next year's WRDA. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Stanton).
Sep 10, 2024
To me, the answer is clear. We should recognize the familiarity and workability of the historic Clean Water Act.
Sep 10, 2024
I believe that every-State-go-it-alone approach is inconsistent with congressional intent on the Clean Water Act.
Mar 21, 2024
I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This will be a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 213, noes 205, not voting 14, as follows: [Roll No. 101] AYES--213…





