I was absent during rollcall votes No. 288, No. 289, No. 290, and No. 291 due to my spouse's health situation in California. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on the Motion on Ordering the Previous Question on the Rule--Providing for consideration of H.R. 2213. I would have voted ``no'' on H. Res. 374-- Rule providing for consideration of H.R. 2213--Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act of 2017. I would have voted ``nay'' on the Motion on Ordering the Previous Question on the Rule providing for consideration of H.R. 10. I would have voted ``nay'' on H. Res. 375-- Rule providing for consideration of H.R. 10--Financial CHOICE Act of 2017. ____________________
Grace Napolitano: “I was absent during rollcall votes No. 288, No. 289, No. 290, and No. 291 due to my spouse's health situation in…”
On the recordJune 7, 2017
Share
More from Grace Napolitano
Sep 10, 2024
The stone, sand and gravel industry urgently needs clarity and certainty regarding Clean Water Act (CWA) permitting.
Sep 9, 2024
the Supreme Court's decision makes it impossible for the country to achieve Congress's objective in passing the Clean Water Act
Apr 30, 2024
It is imperative we work to address the climate change to protect our water supplies and increase the presence of regional, large-scale water projects for the benefit of the future U.S. climate change.
Mar 21, 2024
The Clean Water Act was specifically enacted as a Federal-State partnership. Today, EPA has approved 47 States to implement the point source discharge program under section 402 of the Clean Water Act. Their status as coregulators makes…





