Mr. Speaker, I was absent during rollcall votes No. 288, No. 289, No. 290, and No. 291 due to my spouse's health situation in California. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on the Motion on Ordering the Previous Question on the Rule--Providing for consideration of H.R. 2213. I would have voted ``no'' on H. Res. 374-- Rule providing for consideration of H.R. 2213--Anti-Border Corruption Reauthorization Act of 2017. I would have voted ``nay'' on the Motion on Ordering the Previous Question on the Rule providing for consideration of H.R. 10. I would have voted ``nay'' on H. Res. 375-- Rule providing for consideration of H.R. 10--Financial CHOICE Act of 2017. ____________________
On the recordJune 7, 2017
Share & report
More from Grace Napolitano
Sep 10, 2024
I believe that every-State-go-it-alone approach is inconsistent with congressional intent on the Clean Water Act.
Sep 10, 2024
Clean water was not always a partisan issue, and no issue has more support among American families than the protection of our nation's waters.
Mar 21, 2024
Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Graves). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes appeared to have…
Mar 21, 2024
Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition, even though I am not opposed to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentlewoman from California is recognized for 5 minutes. There was no objection.





