Grace Napolitano: “Wouldn't these type of non-carbon based projects help to lessen our dependence on carbon based energy resources, like…”

I believe the Supreme Court purposefully chose to substitute its own philosophy over decades-old, legally grounded efforts to protect water quality.

I support the amendment offered by the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. James). Communities across the Nation have learned firsthand of the human health risks associated with forever chemicals such as PFAS, a pollutant that is found in…

I claim the time in opposition, though I am not opposed. The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentlewoman from California is recognized for 5 minutes. There was no objection.

I believe the question of who should ultimately be responsible for protecting rivers, streams, and wetlands has become hyper-politicized.