Right now, because the Governor waited so long to do any price increases, the PUC eventually raised prices up to about 48 percent. We have a home in California and pay generally when we are not there about $48 a month, and it went up to about, in our particular case, almost $200 a month, even when we are not there on occasion, and so the price increases are very steep in California. Californians are beginning to feel that right now. But they should know that had the Governor acted earlier, the price increases would have only been about 20 to 25 percent and would have corrected the problem and, frankly, saved the State billions of dollars, at least $8 billion, probably $20 billion.
George P. Radanovich: “Right now, because the Governor waited so long to do any price increases, the PUC eventually raised prices up to about…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of delayed price increases on Californians' utility bills.
Share
More from George P. Radanovich
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5666, sponsored by our colleague, Mike Simpson, allows for the early repayment of capital costs associated with a Federal water project in Idaho. Under existing law, landowners who benefit from this water project cannot…
Thanks, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I rise to support H.R. 5252, the COPE Act. Today's communications networks have become national and international in nature, therefore it does not make sense to still require companies to provide video…
first of all, I like to call this bill ``the good neighbor act'' even though its real name is the Gateway Communities Cooperation Act. The purpose of the bill is to make certain that small communities located just outside the Federal…
the Pactola Dam, located near Rapid City, South Dakota, stores water from Rapid Creek and is part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. This bill authorizes reallocation of a portion of the construction costs of the Pactola Dam and…





