It just is not true, and I think, if you pose the argument that if a person is taxed less and regulated less, then they will be more productive, is an argument that both sides of this aisle will buy. But if you go to the next stage of the argument and say OK, how do they begin to regulate and tax less to the benefit of the American people, this side of the aisle says all right, let's go. Let's work this plan out. That side of the aisle says no. But there is no logic behind why they are saying no, because that side of the aisle will also agree to the fact that if we are taxed less and regulated less, we will be more productive. But their logic starts there. God knows why.
George P. Radanovich: “It just is not true, and I think, if you pose the argument that if a person is taxed less and regulated less, then they…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of taxation and regulation on productivity during a floor speech.
Share
More from George P. Radanovich
H.R. 4617 would facilitate the exchange of two small tracts of land under the Small Tracts Act in the Tahoe National Forest in California. The first would exchange 3 acres of mineral rights from the Forest Service to the owner of the…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5666, sponsored by our colleague, Mike Simpson, allows for the early repayment of capital costs associated with a Federal water project in Idaho. Under existing law, landowners who benefit from this water project cannot…
I rise in support of H.R. 3897, the Madera Water Supply Enhancement Act. This legislation authorizes the Bureau of Reclamation to participate in the design and construction of the Madera Water Supply Enhancement Project. This important…
Mr. Speaker, S. 1778, introduced by Senator Lisa Murkowski, would authorize a land conveyance between the Secretary of Agriculture and the City of Craig, Alaska. This legislation authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to acquire…





