As I understand it, the historical commitment or the all-time high was $135 million. That times two is not quite $300 million. The obligation to PILT is $320 million. There is no chance that it is subject to full funding under this type of scenario because, under CARA, what was appropriated would be matched.
Discussing funding obligations related to the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program.
Share
More from George P. Radanovich
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 4606, authored by the gentleman from California (Mr. Baca), authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the funding and implementation of a balanced, long-term groundwater remediation program in California…
Mr. Speaker, S. 1219, introduced by Senator Conrad Burns and supported by our Montana colleague, Mr. Dennis Rehberg, allows two Fort Peck Indian Reservation tribes to lease water to nearby non-Indian communities. Because water supplies are…
My constituents didn't need a stimulus bill full of funds to go to solve problems elsewhere or to clean up the environment; they need water.
Mr. Speaker, Senate 819, introduced by Senator Tim Johnson of South Dakota, reallocates the costs of the Pactola Dam and Reservoir to reflect growing municipal needs for water. As Rapid City's municipal water needs are growing at a rapid…
Other voices in this conversation
