I guess the bottom line is that we have a disagreement on whether or not a corporation such as LSC, that has recklessly spent that money, should be further funded beyond this point.
George P. Radanovich: “I guess the bottom line is that we have a disagreement on whether or not a corporation such as LSC, that has recklessly…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for the Legal Services Corporation during a House debate.
Share
More from George P. Radanovich
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 4606, authored by the gentleman from California (Mr. Baca), authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the funding and implementation of a balanced, long-term groundwater remediation program in California…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5666, sponsored by our colleague, Mike Simpson, allows for the early repayment of capital costs associated with a Federal water project in Idaho. Under existing law, landowners who benefit from this water project cannot…
The purpose, Madame Chairwoman, of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, better known as the Stimulus, was to stimulate the economy and create American jobs.
My state is facing a water crisis of epic proportions. Three record dry years, in culmination with judicial decisions that favor fish over humans, have resulted in our current crisis.





