Mr. Chairman, first of all, let me say a word of thanks to my colleagues on both sides of the aisle for allowing me the time that they did and for allowing us to speak in favor of H.R. 5. I think that will be a positive and constructive thing for us to have that debate. We will talk about what we have heard today, the threat to public health. Let me just make a quick comment. This bill is no threat to public health. This just simply says that if we think it is good enough to be a national policy, then it is good enough to fund. It does not remove the clean air standards. It does not remove clean water standards. It simply says that if we think it is good enough to legislate and mandate across the country, it is good enough to pay for.
Gary Condit: “Mr. Chairman, first of all, let me say a word of thanks to my colleagues on both sides of the aisle for allowing me the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing H.R. 5 and addressing concerns about public health during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Gary Condit
I do have a problem with the manager's amendment. If we come in with a very broad amendment, we could undercut the very intention of the unfunded mandate legislation in that if it did not qualify for a point of order, it could put all…
I rise in support of H.R. 4924, the Truth in Regulating Act of 2000. I would like to thank the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Burton); the ranking member, the gentleman from California (Mr. Waxman); the gentlewoman from New York (Mrs. Kelly)…
It is unfortunate that an insatiable appetite for sensationalism blocked so many for searching for the real answers for so long.
Let me just say from the outset, H.R. 350, the Mandate Information Act of 1999, this bill does not stop legislative mandates. Let me repeat that. The bill does not stop mandates. If this body chooses to pass a mandate on local business…





