Mr. Chairman, I rise to make a general comment. I heard a few minutes ago one of the Members make reference to this is as a 100-day agenda, and what we are doing here today is doing what is not necessarily good for the country in the long term, but we are pushing a 100-day agenda. I want to make it perfectly clear, and excuse me for taking issue with you on that statement, but this is not a 100-day agenda that we are working on today. This is an issue that we have been coming to grips with for years. We have introduced unfunded mandate legislation years ago, not exactly the same legislation, but we have introduced a number of bills years ago, had hearings, formed caucuses. This is an agenda about unfunded mandates. This is not a Republican issue. This is not a Democratic issue. This is an issue about the American people, and we need to respond to it in that way, not that it is a 100-day issue.
Gary Condit: “Mr. Chairman, I rise to make a general comment. I heard a few minutes ago one of the Members make reference to this is…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the misconception of a 100-day agenda regarding unfunded mandates.
Share
More from Gary Condit
Mr. Chairman, I want to just bring up a point, I spoke a minute ago and I wanted to talk a little bit about the intent of this bill. The intent of this bill is to provide information to the Members about the cost of an unfunded mandate on…
Basically, the problem exists with EPA's interpretation of the Clean Water Act. The EPA has interpreted constructed water conveyance facilities to be waters of the United States and therefore subject to the same Clean Water Act standards…
I stand today to oppose the rule. I have a great deal of respect for the chairman of the Committee on Rules, but I want those of my colleagues who can hear me, who can hear the sound of my voice to listen to the amendment that was turned…
It is unfortunate that an insatiable appetite for sensationalism blocked so many for searching for the real answers for so long.





