Reclaiming my time, let me first of all, Mr. Chairman, speak to the fact that, having reentered the body, I think some of the applications for the local law enforcement funds under the gentleman's version of the crime bill the last session were already well underway by the time that I returned to the House, although we hasten to point out that it is not our intent here to jeopardize funds that have been committed. Our intent here, though, is to maximize flexibility and local decisionmaking on the part of those individuals who are closest to the problems in their local communities. That is the thrust of this legislation.
Frank Riggs: “Reclaiming my time, let me first of all, Mr. Chairman, speak to the fact that, having reentered the body, I think some…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing local law enforcement funding and decision-making in relation to a crime bill.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
Now that we have struck that note of bipartisan cooperation and agreement, I just want to interject for the Record, and here I think is the clear, and I believe collegial difference between the Democratic Members of the House of…
I wish I would have heard a better response to his concerns from the delegate for the District of Columbia than to simply say, try parental choice in the City of Alexandria public schools. It so happens that the City of Alexandria…
Yes, and my opinion is that that local school district should have to go to court to adjudicate an unclear or conflicting provision between Federal and State law. And then if a Federal court order results, then obviously that local school…
I am very comfortable with language that would say that a court order, Federal court order would take precedence over State and local law with respect to bilingual education or State local policy. But, Mr. Chairman, I cannot support an…





