I would just explain to my good friend and colleague that the one thing that we do not want to do here is impose even more reporting requirements or regulatory compliance on charter schools. That obviously goes against the whole idea of decentralizing and deregulating public schools. But the one concern we still have on this side is requiring charter schools to provide to the Department or their contractor or whoever is conducting the ongoing study. Obviously, I think we should mention to our colleagues that the Department did the first-year study in-house. That said, our concern is requiring charter schools to gather disaggregated data on family income. That is the concern.
Frank Riggs: “I would just explain to my good friend and colleague that the one thing that we do not want to do here is impose even…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about regulatory requirements for charter schools.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
I am very comfortable with language that would say that a court order, Federal court order would take precedence over State and local law with respect to bilingual education or State local policy. But, Mr. Chairman, I cannot support an…
Now, what did the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decide in the Hopwood case? Hopwood v. The University of Texas, I quote: ``The 5th circuit ruled that diversity does not justify preferential admissions based on race.''
So the amendment in its current form is intended to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to prevent the City and County of San Francisco government... from being able to use Federal taxpayer funding... to require that private…
I wish I would have heard a better response to his concerns from the delegate for the District of Columbia than to simply say, try parental choice in the City of Alexandria public schools. It so happens that the City of Alexandria…





