the most effective way to preserve threatened species is by improving and expanding their habitat. One might expect that an endangered species law would reward people for creating habitat. It does not do that. For example, it could pay people who establish breeding grounds for the spotted owl or the marbled murrelet. We do not do that. Instead, we punish those who happen to have endangered species on their property. It is the wrong way to go about it. It benefits all of society. We should not impose on small property owners the imposition that does us all good. We need to change our policy. It is not a good amendment.
Frank Riggs: “the most effective way to preserve threatened species is by improving and expanding their habitat. One might expect that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the shortcomings of endangered species laws and their impact on property owners.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
I take the floor tonight because I think it is very important that a Member of this body speak out with respect to some of the inferences or suggestions that have been made that are in a way somewhat related, although I would suggest very…
I just, first of all, want to thank the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Scott) for what I think is a good-faith decision on his part to raise this issue for debate but perhaps not to pursue an amendment. We disagree on, if you will, the…
I would like to refer her to an article in today's newspaper that is very timely to this evening's debate headlined Boalt Minority Admissions Up 30 Percent. I quote from the first paragraph of the article: ``In the school's second year of…
fundamentally this debate is about the refusal of my colleagues on the other side to give up their Band-Aid-- their fig leaf--their placebo for the failure of their great society social programs and the failure of the public education…





