In fact we learned from the example of Thomas Jefferson High School. We acted upon the testimony that we heard at our hearing. In our bill, we have said under the section dealing with the permissible uses of funds, that the funding can be used by local institutions--a high school or regional vocational school--to provide, and I quote now from the bill, work-related experience such as internships, cooperative education, school-based enterprises--like we also saw up in Delaware where the kids are running a bank at Wilmington High School--entrepreneurship and job shadowing. They are all related to vocational-technical education programs. What we do not do again is attempt to micromanage, we do not dictate, we do not spell out that local schools should use any of the funding to pay for the salaries and benefits of local personnel. We do not, anywhere in the legislation, talk about support for any staff; not teachers, administrators, counselors, or coordinators.
Frank Riggs: “In fact we learned from the example of Thomas Jefferson High School. We acted upon the testimony that we heard at our…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the permissible uses of funds for vocational-technical education programs.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
Mr. Chairman, the first thing I want to say is my daughter attends a public elementary school in Northern Virginia where she is a minority. She is a minority as an Anglo at that particular school. Secondly, I want to say, as I tried to…
I just want to say, let us not get too hysterical about this debate. I want to quote Judson King, provost of the University of California, who acknowledged that the passage and the implementation of Proposition 209 has evened out diversity…
I do not see how we can support a policy that... facilitates, furthers illegal drug use and actually... puts us as lawmakers... in the position of... engaging in enabling behavior. And, furthermore, it sends the worst possible message that…
So the amendment in its current form is intended to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to prevent the City and County of San Francisco government... from being able to use Federal taxpayer funding... to require that private…





