I want to point out that she obviously did not read the bill, because on page 47 of the bill, section 116, beginning at line 3, we have the language of my amendment, and it says: None of the funds made available in this act may be used by the Department of the Interior to continue or enforce the designation of any critical habitat for the marbled murrelet on private property in the State of California, excluding approximately 3,000 acres of redwood forest commonly known as 'Headwaters Grove', located in Humboldt County, California.
Frank Riggs: “I want to point out that she obviously did not read the bill, because on page 47 of the bill, section 116, beginning at…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing a colleague's remarks about a bill concerning critical habitat designation.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
That mandate is embedded in current law, and what we are trying to do now by proposing reforms to the Federal Bilingual and Immigration Education Acts is to give local school districts more say, more flexibility, more discretion, more…
So the amendment in its current form is intended to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to prevent the City and County of San Francisco government... from being able to use Federal taxpayer funding... to require that private…
Now that we have struck that note of bipartisan cooperation and agreement, I just want to interject for the Record, and here I think is the clear, and I believe collegial difference between the Democratic Members of the House of…
I am very astounded to hear the gentleman say that our proposed reforms constitute a one-size-fits-all mandate imposed on State and local education agencies. My question to the gentleman... is does he realize that under current Federal…





