I just want to again make a couple of points. One is that there are adequate employee protections built into the Working Families Flexibility Act and that explicit language in the bill prohibits an employer from compelling an employee to take compensatory time, or time off, in lieu of overtime compensation. So no employee in any occupation in any industry can be compelled to take compensatory time off in lieu of overtime compensation. This is a good and fair bill. It is balanced. It is a bill that is designed to relieve some of the pressure, some of the strain that working families, particularly two-income families face today in America, and it is a bill that is designed to help families attend to their unique circumstance and needs. This is a practice that has been working well in the public sector for years and years and years and I can speak to that from personal experience, and I really do not understand when we have the President on record as in favor of this concept, at least in favor of this legislation, conceptually saying, 'You can choose money in the bank or time on the clock.'
Frank Riggs: “I just want to again make a couple of points. One is that there are adequate employee protections built into the Working…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Working Families Flexibility Act and its employee protections.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
Martin Luther King, I think we can agree on this, he dreamed of the day, he spoke of the day, he preached of the day when all Americans would participate freely in the American dream. I cannot see how continuing institutionalized…
this is a historic moment. Only twice before in the history of our great Republic have we stood at the brink of such dramatic action concerning a sitting President. The burden upon us as Members of this House is great, and one that I do…
So the amendment in its current form is intended to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to prevent the City and County of San Francisco government... from being able to use Federal taxpayer funding... to require that private…
Mr. Chairman I yield myself 1\1/2\ minutes to respond to the last speaker. The gentleman should not be throwing stones in his glass house. If we are going to examine our own internal practices in the United States House of Representatives…





