I guarantee Adam Schiff is not going to make this a voluntary interview. He's going to subpoena things and subpoena people.
Eric Swalwell
The Public Record
Eric Michael Swalwell is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for California's 15th congressional district since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Swalwell has focused on issues such as gun control, healthcare, and technology policy during his time in office. He gained national attention for his role in the impeachment proceedings against former President Donald Trump and has been an advocate for progressive reforms within the Democratic Party.
People sent us hear to understand what the Russians did. What role, if any, the Trump campaign members played in working with the Russians.
At best, this demonstrates bad judgment that we would be drawn so close to the Russians. At worse, this may be witting cooperation.
If the story about George Nader being in the seashells with Erik Prince to establish this Russia back channel is true, Eric Prince lied to our committee.
I still believe, Anderson, that the American people are going to speak this November and that they're going to want checks and balances in place.
Not really, Anderson. There's a growing wall between our investigation and the truth and Mr. Lewandowski added bricks to that wall today.
Our committee members, I think, show today more fidelity to protecting Donald Trump than protecting the ballot box.
Today Anderson more bricks were put into the wall between a congressional investigation and what happened with the Trump campaign and Russia.
We have a situation here really with a rogue son-in-law of the president of the United States that nobody except perhaps the special prosecutor and perhaps the president of the United States knows really what the hell he has been up to.
I think he should be sidelined from having access to any classified information.
If the President wants to be incompetent, unqualified people on his staff, that's his priority.
I'm afraid to say, means that it was more likely that Republicans just wanted to punish a perceived political enemy of theirs.
Ms. Hicks told us that the White House had told her that she was not allowed to talk about anything that has happened since the Election Day.
I do believe -- I am skeptical. The President has been consistent in this investigation only in his obstructive behavior.
If these are political edits, then it is really incumbent upon Devin Nunes to follow the lead that he set last week when he asked his colleagues to unanimously support releasing this memo to the public.
In this Chamber last week, the President came and touted that the stock market was roaring and the unemployment rate was down. Today, he called us traitors for not applauding those numbers. A couple of days later, Speaker Ryan said a…
Just because the public knew, it's never been the practice to acknowledge the evidence that's out there.
They are supposed to allow the judge, who is, you know, the independent branch of government, to have all the facts available so they can make in an unbiased way a determination as to whether probable cause has been met.
The court should be aware of, you know, potential biases that witnesses have.
I believe the intent here is to try and undermine them and see them gone.
The larger issue here is the rule of law, the idea that political leaders in a democracy do not go after the police when they're being investigated or use the police to investigate their opponents.
It doesn't make a lot of sense. And it also doesn't flow legally that he would be willing to talk to Bob Mueller, but under subpoena to Congress, that he would not answer any of our questions.
It appears that there is something they don't want Steve Bannon to tell us.
They cannot really and they should not know what we're asking Mr. Bannon.





