I thank the distinguished chairman of the subcommittee, Mr. Scott, and I would like to thank the other cosponsors of this bill, Mr. Huizenga, Ms. Moore, and Mr. Maloney, for joining me in this bipartisan effort to help bring transparency to the global swap markets. I certainly appreciate the subcommittee chairman's support as well. While I might not agree with every provision in the Dodd-Frank law today, I believe we are working towards its bipartisan goal of giving regulators the tools they need to improve systemic risk mitigation in the global financial markets. I think everyone agrees that the lack of transparency and the over- the-counter derivatives markets escalated the financial crisis of 2008. In order to provide market transparency, the Dodd-Frank law requires posttrade reporting to swap data repositories, or SDRs as they are called, so that regulators and market participants have access to realtime market data that will help identify systemic risk in the financial system. So far, we have made great strides in reaching this goal, but, unfortunately, a provision in the law threatens to undermine our progress unless we fix it. Currently, Dodd-Frank requires a provision requiring a foreign regulator to indemnify a U.S.-based SDR from any expenses arising from litigation relating to a request from market data.…
On the recordJuly 14, 2015
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Eric Crawford
Dec 1, 2023
I was unable to attend votes today due to a previously scheduled family commitment. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 690 and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 691. ____________________
Mar 20, 2024
When one State proposes policies that have implications on interstate commerce, it affects travelers in other communities.
Jun 19, 2024
Thank you for your consideration of an issue vital to safety and for continuing to take steps toward reducing fatalities on our nation's roadways.
Feb 12, 2025
Today I was unable to vote in the afternoon due to attending an event at the White House that was during voting time. Had I been present, I would have voted NAY on Roll Call No. 40 and YEA on Roll Call No. 41. personal explanation





