When the gentleman said we have not had an opportunity to debate this, I would remind the gentleman that we debated this for 2 hours on the floor of this House, which is a bigger committee and a broader committee than any individual committee. It was debated; it was included in the bill; it passed by a 100-vote margin on a bipartisan level; it was taken out at the conference committee level. So with all due respect to my good friend from California, this bill has had the attention, and for the sake of expediting the overall bill, I suggested that we have it as a stand alone. That is the reason it came. This is where it should be.
Elton Gallegly: “When the gentleman said we have not had an opportunity to debate this, I would remind the gentleman that we debated this…”
Editor's note · Context
Defending the debate and passage of a bill during House floor discussion.
Share
More from Elton Gallegly
This was the worst train accident in California history. I use the word 'accident' lightly, because many of us do not believe it was an accident, that it was something that clearly should have been prevented.
The reason this was taken out is the President of the United States, our President, said he would veto any bill that gave the States anything short of an unfunded mandate in perpetuity, guaranteeing a free public education entitlement for…
I think it is very simple. If we have a voluntary system, there is no compliance.
In the era of droughts and water shortages throughout California, I believe we need to do all we can to reduce our dependence on imported water.





