Today, I rise to discuss Mr. Rohrabacher's Amendment (No. 1) to the Water Resources Development Act of 2003 (H.R. 2557). This amendment is well intended since it seeks to find a way to provide additional funds for needed port security improvements. It permits seaports to impose fees to be collected on a per container basis to be used for port security. On May 21, 2003, after holding a hearing on port security, with my Government Reform Subcommittee Ranking Member John Tierney, I introduced a bi-partisan bill, entitled the ``Port Security Improvements Act of 2003'' (H.R. 2193). Our bill takes a different approach. To date, Congress has provided extensive Federal funding to fully ensure air security. In contrast, Congress has not provided sufficient Federal funding to fully ensure port security. Currently, the U.S. Customs Bureau collects $15.6 billion in duties on commodities entering the U.S. through marine transportation. Our bill dedicates a portion of these duties for five years toward port security enhancements. In addition, our bill reflects other recommendations from our witnesses.
Doug Ose: “Today, I rise to discuss Mr. Rohrabacher's Amendment (No. 1) to the Water Resources Development Act of 2003 (H.R. 2557).…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing port security funding and the Port Security Improvements Act of 2003.
Share
More from Doug Ose
The original authorization to build this fence gave the Attorney General the opportunity to waive all of these things the previous speaker voted for. You cannot have it both ways. You are either for protecting this country or you are not.
I have to say, I do not know where the gentlewoman was when he hit number 71, but it was against the Los Angeles Dodgers. I just want to get that in the Record. When he turned on that fast ball, imagine the audacity on number 71. It was…
I am troubled by various provisions in the Farm Security Act of 2002 (H.R. 2646). Today, I would like to mention one specific provision, which appears in four titles in the bill--in Titles I, Commodity Programs (Sec. 1601); Title II…
I think the gentleman from Alabama started out very accurately reflecting the broad consensus on 90 percent of this bill, and I think he closed here just this moment with a very eloquent case as to why we need to stop the free rider…





