Doris Matsui

It is amazing that we are here today when we think about how far the internet has progressed.

If Facebook doesn't want to play referee about the truth in political speech, then they should get out of the game.

A balanced approach to the introduction of wireless services is not only critical, but necessary for expanding the use in the six gigahertz band.

This bill will create a new fund that provides financial incentives to small and rural wireless providers to replace certain equipment of Huawei and ZTE with new equipment that includes secure hardware and software capabilities.

We must continue to consider policies as per U.S. leadership and innovation in the 5G race.

My bill, the WIN 5G Act, strikes the right balance by aiming to clear at least 300 megahertz of spectrum.

More fundamentally, my proposal reflects the three pillars necessary to this reallocation: repurposing the maximum amount of spectrum possible, protecting current users, and ensuring an efficient clearing process.

I remain concerned with the fact that an FCC action taken to allow a portion of the satellite operators to financially benefit from any sale, while another portion with the exact same market rights does not benefit, will result in the need…

As you know, Agenda Item 1.13 will be considered at WRC-19 to discuss identification of additional millimeter wave bands for International Mobile Telecommunications, or IMT.

CCA thanks Representatives Matsui and Guthrie for introducing this bill and supports its consideration.

Last month, Congressman Guthrie and I, along with Senators Wicker and Schatz, introduced the SPECTRUM NOW Act.

My draft WIN 5G Act proposes to ensure the spectrum is reallocated rapidly by building capacity within the C-band.

I released the WIN 5G Act, to propose a compromise, consensus-based approach to rapidly reallocate the spectrum.

the C-band has been one of the most complex and high-stakes proceedings in front of the Commission and Congress.

the Clean Air Act clearly states that Congress intended California to have the broadest possible discretion in selecting the best means to protect the health of its citizens.

the fight against climate change and the fight to clean our air and improve public health are intertwined.

Why won't you engage? Why did you walk away from the table, given you had these options?

That is why we need to pass my bill, H.R. 978, the Clean and Efficient Cars Act, which reverses the Trump administration's attacks on forward-looking fuel efficiency and emissions standards.

Chair Nichols actually states that California was open to accommodation, such as adjustments to compliance, timing, and flexibility.

the Trump administration's EPA is once again abdicating its responsibility to protect public health and the environment.

Obviously, if this was rejected at this time, we know there would be disastrous outcome should the administration move forward.

Under the Clean Air Act, federally funded transportation projects must demonstrate that they meet air quality goals.

I want to thank you for the extraordinary work you have done throughout your career to really clean the air not only for Californians but all the rest of the country.

If we go back in the opposite direction that my two grandchildren are going to be facing smog alerts like my children don't have to--however, like I had to.

I think you addressed this. He sent a letter supposedly refuting your testimony.