When there is competition, then the logical thing to do is to go for a fixed price, because otherwise if you compete it and it's cost-plus, then it gives the companies the opportunity to raise their prices effectively.
Dianne Feinstein
The Public Record
Dianne Emiel Feinstein was an American politician who served as a United States Senator from California from 1992 until her death in 2023. She was the first woman to hold this position, breaking significant barriers in a predominantly male political landscape. Throughout her tenure, Feinstein was known for her advocacy on issues such as gun control, environmental protection, and intelligence oversight, playing a pivotal role in shaping legislation in these areas.
I would think that would be your answer. And I would think that that would be satisfactory, because, after all, competition is the American basic demand for the accordance of a contract.
So you believe that you will be able to compete for 14 EELV launches by fiscal year 2015?
Now, according to the Kendall memo that I just mentioned, new entrants should be able to begin competing for up to 14 EELV launches by fiscal year 2015.
The memo states, and let me read it. 'I direct the Air Force to aggressively introduce a competitive procurement environment in the EELV program by competing up to 14 cores with initial contract awards as early as 2015 for missions that…
I don't believe that the promised savings of eliminating competition have materialized. The cost to the Government, to the taxpayer really has skyrocketed.
The U.S. has got to deploy its resources better in terms of intelligence.