I am in shock.
Our nuclear propulsion program has 60 years of exceptional performance, safe, reliable, effective operations.
How do you reconcile making it more usable with deterrence?
We do not have a no first use policy. And this is geared toward Russia.
My view has been, and I have been in this business as I indicated earlier, in the military and now here for over 40 year...
In the December 2016 Defense Science Board report, they called for integrating nuclear and non-nuclear capabilities for ...
I have supported the efforts to work with hospitals and medical facilities and industrial users to replace existing devi...
I remember the pictures in the San Francisco Chronicle and other papers when we dropped the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagas...
The purpose of these weapons is to provide deterrence so that any other nation or sub state actor who has a nuclear weap...
The so-called improvements to this weapon seem to be designed to make it more usable to help us fight and win a limited ...
I think to an extent we sacrifice our real security needs for more warheads that we do not need.