On the recordApril 27, 2016
I would argue that under the Constitution it is not.
Source
congress.govI would argue that under the Constitution it is not.
Lungren argues that the DOJ's decision on funds is unconstitutional.
Share
More from Daniel E. Lungren
I am hopeful that these incidents represent the low-water mark for FPS, and I am cautiously optimistic about FPS's future.
I appreciate the fact that it is now recognized as a current and continuing threat to us, that is, the operation of a lone wolf.
We have an obligation to proceed with legislation on important issues such as cybersecurity.