We need a balanced budget amendment, because spending is running out of control. Take a look at this chart. In 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, and 1973, a 5-year period, the total Federal spending was $1.1 trillion. In 1994, Bill Clinton's budget for 1 year is far more than the 5 years from 1969 to 1973, the guns-and-butter years of Vietnam, the height of the Vietnam war. Look at this number, 1994 through 1998, the Clinton budget, $8.1 trillion in spending compared to what George Bush and this Congress did, $6.6 trillion in spending over 4 years. We are not cutting things. They are getting more and more and more expensive. And we are financing it, yes, with the largest tax increase in American history, because that is what happens when we spend this rapidly, but also, with increased borrowing from the Treasury, that gives us a national debt that is setting a record. We are told that we should not have a balanced budget amendment. What we should have is a capital budget. A capital budget would let us achieve the appearance of a balanced budget by moving the goal posts. We would define away most of our spending and call it investment. And if spending is investment, then we get to borrow in order to pay for it. In short, a capital budget would provide the intellectual underpinnings for still more deficit spending.
C. Cox: “We need a balanced budget amendment, because spending is running out of control. Take a look at this chart. In 1969…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a balanced budget amendment and criticizing federal spending during a floor speech.
Share
More from C. Cox
Why do we need a balanced budget amendment? I will suggest three reasons. First is rather straightforward: Spending is out of control. The second is that taxes are out of control, driven by the insatiable appetite for more and more Federal…
I rise in opposition to H.R. 6, a bill which would greatly expand the Federal Government's control over the entire landscape of American education. I also rise to express my strong support for the amendment offered by Mr. Armey. Instead of…
Mr. Chairman, we have heard today from a towering figure of our times, the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means, the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Rostenkowski]. He spoke eloquently on the reasons that he believes tax increases…
the question before us now is whether a capital budget is going to help rein in deficit spending or create more of it. In 1986 and 1987 I served on a White House task force on capital budgeting. The purpose was to take a look at this idea…





