I appreciate your concern. But again, I come back to the fact that you do not place the same condition on the other technologies. And if you want to do this, then let's talk about it through the entire technologies, that we are not going to apply that. And the fact is, history has proven, and even though you may not like to admit it, the things like the fence in San Diego that some people thought wouldn't work and the so-called experts said wouldn't work have worked extraordinarily well because we gave it a chance to work before we started cutting it off. And that is exactly what we are seeing here. This is a technology that has proven itself around the world, but you don't want to give it a chance to prove itself along our national frontier.
Brian Bilbray: “I appreciate your concern. But again, I come back to the fact that you do not place the same condition on the other…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the effectiveness of technology in border security.
Share
More from Brian Bilbray
I think that we can gain a lot of credibility by being as tough on our fellow government agencies as we are on the private sector.
The Agency has a responsibility that you do not have the mentality of crucifying people that may not be too guilty, but you've got to make your point.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will report the amendment. The Clerk read as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), add the following new section: Sec. __. None of the funds made available by…
But that is like saying that the people that are a victim of counterfeit isn't going to be prosecuted as counterfeiters when the fact is they're losing value down the line.





