There is no slippery slope. What it says is those that have proven scientifically there is no reasonable reason to think there is environmental damage that is going to occur should not have to go through a process of having to go through EPA and the Federal bureaucracy. I think you would agree if we in the 1970's were told by scientists there is no foreseeable damage or foreseeable problem with water quality, this law would never have been passed. In San Diego the scientists have said that, and I think you need to reflect it.
Brian Bilbray: “There is no slippery slope. What it says is those that have proven scientifically there is no reasonable reason to think…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing environmental regulations and scientific assessments of water quality.
Share
More from Brian Bilbray
But that is like saying that the people that are a victim of counterfeit isn't going to be prosecuted as counterfeiters when the fact is they're losing value down the line.
The Agency has a responsibility that you do not have the mentality of crucifying people that may not be too guilty, but you've got to make your point.
I think it is time that we put the pressure on our mayors and our county supervisors, and our State officials, just like we put on our automobile manufacturers.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will report the amendment. The Clerk read as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), add the following new section: Sec. __. None of the funds made available by…





