Justice Clark was clarifying that it is not a totally different issue and that has not been overturned yet. The letters from the judges, as somebody who ran a county of 2.5 million full of judges, I know what the process likes to be and would like to be. They have to follow the Constitution too. Mr. Chairman, this clarifies the fact that again, if the 3-judge process has worked and continues to work with reapportionment, then all parts of activity that relate to reapportionment should be following the same rule. Mr. Chairman, I insist that we recognize that the gentleman from California [Mr. Bono] is only reinforcing a ruling that was made by the Supreme Court and basically statutorily corrects an inconsistency that we have detected recently. And we not only have the right to correct this inconsistency; we have the responsibility.
Brian Bilbray: “Justice Clark was clarifying that it is not a totally different issue and that has not been overturned yet. The letters…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of following constitutional processes in reapportionment.
Share
More from Brian Bilbray
I want to indicate my strong support of H.R. 5651, the Food and Drug Administration Reform Act of 2012, which we are addressing on the House floor today. This bipartisan legislation is not only good for the health of the American public…
I think that the fact is people are starting to depend on this for more and more, and they want it consolidated.
There are changes need to be made, and reform is not a bad word in a lot of episodes.
Mr. Bunker, I think you and everybody else that's required to enforce either a law or regulation understands that when the Legislature passes a law, there's always the assumption of discretionary enforcement.





