But I think that if you reviewed this situation and the process these two Border Patrol agents went through, you would understand why some of us are standing up and saying, first of all, the 10-year minimum for the commission of a crime while carrying a firearm, it was used to apply to these agents, was never meant to apply to law enforcement agents who are required by law to carry firearms. And I think we can kind of understand. Remember when we passed that and it went through, it was sort of like, criminals, if you are going to engage in criminal activity, leave your gun at home, as a way of lowering the level of violence and the potential violence of criminals carrying firearms at the time of the commission of the crime. This law that we passed at the Federal level is being applied to Federal officers who are required by statute to carry a firearm. And so now what we have is that we have law enforcement agents who are sworn to serve the American people, that are being prosecuted under a statute that says we are going to nail you because you were carrying a firearm during the commission of a crime when, as a requirement of their employment, they had to carry the firearm. Doesn't anybody else find this kind of absurd, if not ridiculous?
Brian Bilbray: “But I think that if you reviewed this situation and the process these two Border Patrol agents went through, you would…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the prosecution of Border Patrol agents for carrying firearms in the line of duty.
Share
More from Brian Bilbray
I personally spent a lot of time in Latin America working on certain problems they have down there.
I stand in support of this bill. I want to thank Chairman Upton and the leadership on both sides of the aisle for getting together and doing what's right for the American people. In this time that we talk about economic strife, we've got…
I think that we can gain a lot of credibility by being as tough on our fellow government agencies as we are on the private sector.
I want to indicate my strong support of H.R. 5651, the Food and Drug Administration Reform Act of 2012, which we are addressing on the House floor today. This bipartisan legislation is not only good for the health of the American public…





