The fact is here it is outcome-based. In fact the water quality is not violated as long as scientists at EPA say there is not damage. My concern to you is if the monitoring is done, if the environment is protected, if EPA and all of the scientists say it is fine, why, then why is the process with a million and a half dollars and 26 pounds of paper so important to you to make sure those reports have been filed?
Discussing environmental monitoring and regulatory processes related to water quality.
Share
More from Brian Bilbray
I think that we can gain a lot of credibility by being as tough on our fellow government agencies as we are on the private sector.
What incentive is there for Canada and Mexico to cooperate with us on this issue?
I think it is time that we put the pressure on our mayors and our county supervisors, and our State officials, just like we put on our automobile manufacturers.
Other voices in this conversation
