The fact is here it is outcome-based. In fact the water quality is not violated as long as scientists at EPA say there is not damage. My concern to you is if the monitoring is done, if the environment is protected, if EPA and all of the scientists say it is fine, why, then why is the process with a million and a half dollars and 26 pounds of paper so important to you to make sure those reports have been filed?
Discussing environmental monitoring and regulatory processes related to water quality.
Share
More from Brian Bilbray
What incentive is there for Canada and Mexico to cooperate with us on this issue?
Thank you very much. I appreciate it, Mr. Chairman. Let's join together and pass the repeal of this destructive tax and move forward with good legislation that will provide affordable health care while providing job opportunities for our…
There are changes need to be made, and reform is not a bad word in a lot of episodes.
It is absolutely essential that the Internet is available and that broadband is available to bridge that education gap in Third World countries.
Other voices in this conversation
