I rise in support, but let me say not support in the traditional sense. There are those of us who are parents who have lost young ones and have watched and had to make the decision of what to do with embryos that they have. I think the sanctity of life works both ways. One of the sanctity of life concepts is to make sure that if you are going to lose a loved one, you respect the life and try to maximize the benefit from that loss. I think this bill is trying to address that. I would ask both sides not to point fingers, but to try to find that sanctity of life is something that is interpreted in many ways. One of them is to make sure that if a life is going to be lost, we have a moral obligation to maximize the potential benefit from that loss. That is a respect for sanctity of life that is not discussed enough.
Brian Bilbray: “I rise in support, but let me say not support in the traditional sense. There are those of us who are parents who have…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the moral implications of a bill related to the sanctity of life and the loss of loved ones.
Share
More from Brian Bilbray
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will report the amendment. The Clerk read as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), add the following new section: Sec. __. None of the funds made available by…
It looks like we are more anti-business than we are pro-environment, and I think we need to change that.
Back in the nineties, I introduced a bill dealing with the wilderness area along the border. Originally, those on the other side of the aisle in the Clinton administration opposed the inclusion of roads in that wilderness area--and they…
I am going to interrupt a second. Because, Madam Chair and myself, we have districts that have suffered massive wildfires...





