The fact is that it is costing $1.5 million. The fact is, it is only a 4- to 5-year waiver, and the fact that under our bill all monitoring, the EPA will monitor it, the Environmental Protection Agency of California will monitor it. We have developed a system that scientists say will be the most cost-effective way of approaching this. All of the monitoring, all of the public health protections are there. As long as the environment continues not to be injured, we will continue to move forward. And you have to understand, too, one thing you do not understand that Mr. Filner and I do understand, we have had at the time of this process, this bureaucratic process has been going on, we have had our beaches closed and polluted from other sources that the EPA has ignored.
Brian Bilbray: “The fact is that it is costing $1.5 million. The fact is, it is only a 4- to 5-year waiver, and the fact that under our…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing environmental monitoring and public health protections related to a legislative bill.
Share
More from Brian Bilbray
I personally spent a lot of time in Latin America working on certain problems they have down there.
But that is like saying that the people that are a victim of counterfeit isn't going to be prosecuted as counterfeiters when the fact is they're losing value down the line.
I think history has proven that because Congress pushed it, made them look at new technology, it was aligned.
I want to indicate my strong support of H.R. 5651, the Food and Drug Administration Reform Act of 2012, which we are addressing on the House floor today. This bipartisan legislation is not only good for the health of the American public…





