I think it should be all state sponsors of terrorism and North Korea.

This was Iran's money. The Shah sent $400 million in the 1970s. We held on to it.

I want to address this issue what I think China would want. I mean, they would prefer if North Korea didn't have a nuclear program, but that is not high on their list.

U.S. citizens, I believe, have collected $2.5 billion in settlements from Iran.

I think very few people have taken that position.

I will just comment briefly. It is my understanding that the statute the gentleman was referring to only provides a statement of policy and not a statutory limit on the power of the President.

It would be nice to cling to denuclearization, but as I think you predict, I think as most of us would predict, if we keep doing what we have been doing, we are going to get a very similar result.

Okay, keep in mind, unless the regime is truly threatened and close to falling, they are not going to give up their 10 to 15 weapons because they feel they need those to defend themselves from us.

I don't think we have ever said that they don't owe us anything...

Last century the high-water mark for the NSC was Kissinger. Everything we complain about now was probably more true then, in terms of the NSC.

China emits twice as much greenhouse gases as the United States.

Anything that drives down the price of oil is not just good for motorists in my district, it is good for American foreign policy.