Although we have no objections to the rule itself, many of us believe that the legislation that it makes in order, H.R. 1675, would cause serious harm to our Nation's wildlife refuges, which provide vital habitat for hundreds of species of birds and mammals. Since the first national wildlife refuge was established at Pelican Island, FL, in 1903, the fundamental purpose of the refuge system has been the conservation of wildlife and natural habitat. This legislation would change that by making hunting, fishing, and other recreational uses a primary purpose of the system as well. Thus, this bill would, for the first time, direct the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to place as much importance on providing recreational opportunities in these refuges as on conserving the resources that make these opportunities possible.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over H.R. 1675 and its impact on wildlife refuges during House debate.
Share
More from Anthony Beilenson
Mr. Speaker, we do not oppose House Resolution 529, the rule for the conference report on H.R. 3259, the Intelligence Authorization Act for fiscal year 1997, which the gentleman from Florida explained so well. We do, however, have concerns…
the amendment I am offering addresses the most fundamental challenge facing current and future generations: the alarming rate of human population growth, which underlies virtually every environmental, developmental, and national security…
This bill is a real victory for hard working American families, and after 20 months of gridlock and shutdowns I am pleased that the Republican leadership has finally relented to getting something done for the American people. It is about…
I support the rule and urge my colleagues to do the same. Unfortunately, except for the unfunded mandates legislation the major pieces of legislation that have been considered on the House floor this year have had restricted rules. We…





