Donald Trump represents the most grave danger to this country at least since the end of Jim Crow.

Have we ever seen one party or the other so completely abandon oath to the Constitution?

Guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty…

They care more about this convicted felon than they do the country.

This was 12 ordinary New Yorkers who weighed the evidence and found Donald Trump guilty of 34 felonies.

You're about to nominate a convicted felon and they don't know how to cope with that.

They want to somehow obscure the fact that their about-to-be nominee is now a convicted felon.

Do you know what else is unprecedented? The fact that so many leaders of that party are perfectly fine with all of that.

This is really undermining the rule of law everywhere.

It is just a whole another order of magnitude of deterioration.

You are damn right it is unprecedented. We have never had a President of the United States who was making hush money payments to a porn star.

Of course, the Chair's real problem is that justice remains no respecter of persons, that you can be the former President of the United States, but if you commit crimes, you will be held responsible.

It is crazy and they know better and they continue to push all these conspiracy theories.

Today, I honor the life and legacy of my friend and mentor, former California State Senator Alan Sieroty. A champion of California's environment, arts, and civil rights, Alan paved the way for the creation of the California Coastal…

Due to events in California, I was unfortunately unable to cast my vote for legislation considered on the House floor today. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on roll call No. 177, H.R. 7219--Information Quality Assurance Act; and…

I hereby remove my name as cosponsor of H. Res. 1068. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. LaMalfa). The gentleman's request is granted. ____________________

You understood how they would be manipulated by my colleagues here on the GOP side of the aisle and by President Trump?

Of course, you did disparage the President. You disparaged him in terms you had to know would have a maximal political impact.

What you did write was deeply prejudicial to the interests of the President.

You could have written your report with his -- with comments about his specific recollection as to documents or a set of documents, but you chose a general pejorative reference to the president.

It was your obligation to follow that policy in this report, was it not?

You understood that, didn't you, when you wrote those words?

You understood that, didn't you, Mr. Hur, that you would ignite a political firestorm with that language, didn't you?

In my view, you know, when it comes to a platform or vehicle for speech, we need to look for the, you know, least restrictive means of meeting our objectives.

Look, I think President Biden is doing what he should do. And that is figure out, what's the right answer? What's the right policy?