I do also rise in very strong opposition to this bill. This bill is being brought to this floor for the first time without the benefits of any hearings in the House or any kind of public input. This bill provides an almost open-ended $1 billion in loan guarantees for the steel industry and as much as $500 million in guarantees for the oil and gas industry. To cover potential defaults of administrative cost, $270 million are appropriated. Now, we have an offset for that, we have been told, an offset of an unspecified pro rata recessions from the nondefense travel and administrative accounts in all Federal agencies' fiscal 1999 budgets which have 2 months to run. Now, there are many of these budgets which do not have anything in those accounts, and OMB has acknowledged they have not the slightest idea of how they are going to handle it in those particular budgets.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a bill related to loan guarantees for the steel and oil industries during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Jim Kolbe
reclaiming my time, since I think my time is limited at this point, I would just say that it is in litigation, but it is not exactly the first time that the Congress of the United States has stepped in when there has been litigation to try…
I want to commend both the chairman and the ranking member and this committee for keeping the committee focused on the importance of U.S. global leadership, effective partnership, and good development practices.
Mr. Chairman, I think this amendment is really the height of irresponsibility. It is the height of the ostrich saying, ``Let us put our heads in the sand.'' It is the height of the Alfred E. Newman, ``What, me worry,'' syndrome. It…
It's completely unrealistic, just unrealistic to assume that those people are going to leave with some kind of incentive that's being offered them.





