Mr. Chairman, I think this amendment is really the height of irresponsibility. It is the height of the ostrich saying, ``Let us put our heads in the sand.'' It is the height of the Alfred E. Newman, ``What, me worry,'' syndrome. It pretends we do not have a problem when everybody knows there is a problem, every American. If we talk to Americans out there, they know there is a problem with Social Security. Yet what we are hearing over here is, ``What? There is no problem. There is nothing we need to do here.'' I am glad, actually, that the gentleman from California has brought this amendment to us tonight, because at least it gives us a chance to call attention to the fact that we have a problem. I urge the Members of this body and I urge the American people to read this report, this interim report of the Commission, because it does talk about some of the problems. The simple fact is, we have a system right now that really is not sustainable in the long run. The gentleman from Florida said it very well: We have a cash flow problem that begins in 2016, a cash flow problem. That is a very real problem that we have to deal with 15 years from now, in 2016.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the sustainability of Social Security during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Jim Kolbe
I would like to commend the Chairman and Ranking Member for convening this hearing and for keeping the Committee focused on the importance of U.S. global leadership, effective partnership, and good development practices.
The gentlelady from Maryland--Connie--thank you very much for yielding to me. It is a wonderful privilege to be back with my colleagues, former Members, here today on the floor of the House of Representatives and especially for me to be…
Mr. Chairman, I am not really in opposition to what the gentleman is certainly attempting to do. Let me just say that the gentleman has very eloquently laid out the case I think for microlending programs. I have had an opportunity, as I…
reclaiming my time, since I think my time is limited at this point, I would just say that it is in litigation, but it is not exactly the first time that the Congress of the United States has stepped in when there has been litigation to try…





