I just think that it would have been smarter to bring those people in and walk through the process including by the way the attorney general, the acting attorney general to say how would you implement it and how do we do this in a way that…

Again, I'm arguing that I agreed with President Obama in 2011, and I agree with the notion that you need a tougher security view.

I do believe it contributed to the loss of life in Iraq, and I do believe it cost us problems in our diplomatic relations around the world.

Thirty-five years, he should have done every day of it.

There's not enough adjectives I certainly can't say it even here on cable TV how I feel about this decision.

I have recommended to the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs that Elevation of U.S. Cyber Command can occur immediately upon the decision of the President.

He said it would be Vladimir Putin and he doesn't believe a lot goes on without his knowing something that would influence politics in another country.

the Russians are the peer competitor to us. But I look at other nations. You look at China, for example, and the level of capability and investment they are making.

I do not think it is in the best interest of any of our nations to be in this confrontational approach to doing business.

The decision of how our Nation responds to a state-sponsored malicious cyberattack is one made by our Nation's leaders.

The way we have been handling it isn't working.

If we continue to use tweets after the President is sworn in on January 20th, I get a little concerned, because it is too easy to misconstrue those words.